MA: Bioengineered Skin and Soft Tissue Substitutes
EFFECTIVE: 01/01/2024
Description
Policy
I.200 Amniotic Membrane and AmnioticFluid
- The use of bioengineered skin and soft tissue substitutes is considered scientifically validated for the following indications:
- Breast reconstruction OR
- Diabetic lower extremity ulcers OR
- Venous insufficiency lower extremity ulcers OR
- Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa OR
- Second- or third-degree burns.
- The use of bioengineered skin and soft tissue substitutes is considered investigational for all other indications.
Autologous Cell Harvesting Device
- Autologous cell harvesting device (e.g., RECELL system) is considered scientifically validated for the
treatment of 2nd and 3rd degree burns when the following criteria is met:
- ONE of the following:
- acute partial thickness (2nd and 3rd degree burns in patients 18 years of age and older OR
- in combination with meshed autografting for acute full thickness thermal burn wounds in pediatric or adult patients with 3rd degree burns.
AND
- The member has NONE of the following contraindications.
- wounds clinically diagnosed as infected or with necrotic tissue present in the wound bed AND
- patients with a known hypersensitivity to trypsin or compound sodium lactate solution (e.g., Hartmann's Solution AND
- patients with a known hypersensitivity to anesthetics, adrenaline/epinephrine, povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine solutions AND
- ONE of the following:
- All other uses of autologous cell harvesting device (RECELL system) is considered investigational.
Background
Skin and Soft Tissue Substitutes
Bioengineered skin and soft tissue substitutes may be either acellular or cellular. Acellular products (eg, dermis with cellular material removed) contain a matrix or scaffold composed of materials such as collagen, hyaluronic acid, and fibronectin. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) products can differ in a number of ways, including as species source (human, bovine, porcine), tissue source (eg dermis, pericardium, intestinal mucosa), additives (eg antibiotics, surfactants), hydration (wet, freeze-dried), and required preparation (multiple rinses, rehydration).
Cellular products contain living cells such as fibroblasts and keratinocytes within a matrix. The cells contained within the matrix may be autologous, allogeneic, or derived from other species (eg, bovine, porcine). Skin substitutes may also be composed of dermal cells, epidermal cells, or a combination of dermal and epidermal cells, and may provide growth factors to stimulate healing. Bioengineered skin substitutes can be used as either temporary or permanent wound coverings.
Applications
There are a large number of potential applications for artificial skin and soft tissue products. One large category is nonhealing wounds, which potentially encompasses diabetic neuropathic ulcers, vascular insufficiency ulcers, and pressure ulcers. A substantial minority of such wounds do not heal adequately with standard wound care, leading to prolonged morbidity and increased risk of mortality. For example, nonhealing lower-extremity wounds represent an ongoing risk for infection, sepsis, limb amputation, and death. Bioengineered skin and soft tissue substitutes have the potential to improve rates of healing and reduce secondary complications.
Other situations in which bioengineered skin products might substitute for living skin grafts include certain postsurgical states (eg, breast reconstruction) in which skin coverage is inadequate for the procedure performed, or for surgical wounds in patients with compromised ability to heal. Second- and third-degree burns are another indication in which artificial skin products may substitute for auto- or allografts. Certain primary dermatologic conditions that involve large areas of skin breakdown (eg, bullous diseases) may also be conditions in which artificial skin products can be considered as substitutes for skin grafts. ADM products are also being evaluated in the repair of other soft tissues including rotator cuff repair, following oral and facial surgery, hernias, and other conditions.
Codes
A2002 | A2003 | A2004 | A2005 | A2006 | A2007 | A2008 |
A2009 | A2010 | A2011 | A2012 | A2013 | A2014 | A2015 |
A2016 | A2017 | A2018 | A2019 | A2020 | A2021 | A4100 |
C1832 | C1849 | C9354 | C9356 | C9358 | C9360 | C9363 |
C9364 | Q4100 | Q4101 | Q4102 | Q4103 | Q4104 | Q4105 |
Q4106 | Q4107 | Q4108 | Q4110 | Q4111 | Q4112 | Q4113 |
Q4114 | Q4115 | Q4116 | Q4117 | Q4118 | Q4121 | Q4122 |
Q4123 | Q4124 | Q4125 | Q4126 | Q4127 | Q4128 | Q4130 |
Q4134 | Q4135 | Q4136 | Q4141 | Q4142 | Q4143 | Q4146 |
Q4147 | Q4149 | Q4152 | Q4158 | Q4161 | Q4164 | Q4165 |
Q4166 | Q4167 | Q4175 | Q4182 | Q4193 | Q4195 | Q4196 |
Q4197 | Q4200 | Q4202 | Q4203 | Q4220 | Q4226 |
References
Zelen CM, Orgill DP, Serena TE, et al. An aseptically processed, acellular, reticular, allogenic human dermis improves healing in diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre follow-up trial. International wound journal. Oct 2018;15(5):731-739. PMID 29682897
Chang EI, Liu J. Prospective unbiased experience with three acellular dermal matrices in breast reconstruction. J Surg Oncol. Sep 2017;116(3):365-370. PMID 28444764
Hinchcliff KM, Orbay H, Busse BK, Charvet H, Kaur M, Sahar DE. Comparison of two cadaveric acellular dermal matrices for immediate breast reconstruction: A prospective randomized trial. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS. May 2017;70(5):568-576. PMID 28341592
Baldursson BT, Kjartansson H, Konradsdottir F, Gudnason P, Sigurjonsson GF, Lund SH. Healing rate and autoimmune safety of full-thickness wounds treated with fish skin acellular dermal matrix versus porcine small-intestine submucosa: a noninferiority study. The international journal of lower extremity wounds. Mar 2015;14(1):37-43. PMID 25759413
Lagus H, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Bohling T, Vuola J. Prospective study on burns treated with Integra(R), a cellulose sponge and split thickness skin graft: comparative clinical and histological study--randomized controlled trial. Burns. Dec 2013;39(8):1577-1587. PMID 238800
Holmes J.H., Molnar J.A., Shupp J.W., et al. Demonstrations of the safety and effectiveness of the RECELL® system combined with split thickness meshed autografts for the reduction of donar skin to treate mixed depth burn injuries. Burns. 2019 June;45(4):772-782. doi 10.1016/j.burns.2018. 11.002. Epub 2018 Dec 19 PMID: 3057808 Clinical Trial. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30578048/
Homes J.H., Molnar J.A., Carter J.E t al. A comparative study of the RECELL® device and autologous split thickness meshed skin graft in the treatment of acute burn injuries. J Burn Care Res. 2018 August 17;39(5):694-7002. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/iry029. PMID: 29800234
Denys, A., Monbailliu, T., Allaeys, M., et al. Management of abdominal wound dehiscence: update of the literature and meta-analysis. Hernia. 2020: doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02294-4
Rosen, M.J., Krpata, D., Petro, C.C., et al. Biologic vs Synthetic Mesh for Single-stage Repair of Contaminated Ventral Hernias: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surgery. 2022;157(4):293-301.0
Jakob, M.O., Haltmeier, T., Candinas, D., Beldi, G. Biologic Mesh Implantation is Associated with Serious Abdominal Wall Complications in Patients Undergoing Emergency Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;89(6):1149-1155.